The opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
As early as 2006, Harvard Business School Professor Noam Wasserman published a Paper entitled “Rich versus King: The Entrepreneur’s Dilemma.” The dilemma was whether, as a founder, you’d somewhat earn money or keep control – which meant you could not have each.
Wasserman’s reasoning was that if you must get wealthy, you would like investors, and then you definately inevitably lose control. If you must be king, you might have to finance your organization yourself, which implies its potential for large growth is null and void.
“At every step, entrepreneurs face a choice between making money and managing their businesses,” Wasserman said. writes“Those who do not find out what is more important to them often end up neither rich nor powerful.”
With all due respect to Wasserman, that is simply not true. For proof, look no further than Sara Blakely of Spanx, Tom Preston-Werner, Chris Wanstrath and PJ Hyett of GitHub, or Will Dean and Guy Livingstone of Tough Mudder, all founders who’ve built their firms to profitability without outside investment.
As a bootstrapped founder myself, I imagine there may be numerous misinformation and inaccurate assumptions about what bootstrapping is and the potential it may well have.
Related: 3 Essential Skills I Learned by Building My Business from Scratch
Why bootstrapping continues to be a well-kept secret
Let’s start with the fundamentals: Bootstrapping is the technique of starting and running a business without outside investment, using the capital the founder has and the revenue the business later generates.
The opposite of bootstrapping is raising capital through angel investors or VC. These operations are inclined to get numerous press coverage for several reasons: First, spectacular funding rounds are considered newsworthy events, and there may be a robust public perception that the corporate receiving large amounts of capital is on the verge of a smash hit (although this is much from at all times the case). In addition, bootstrapping founders are sometimes more busy putting their resources into constructing and developing their products than worrying about PR or media relations.
The technology company Zoho, for instance, became the primary SaaS company with over 100 million users. In response to a Reddit post When asked why self-funding firms like Zoho do not get much attention, one commenter said the reply is straightforward: the trail just is not as sexy.
“[Bootstrappers] are not at startup meetups, they don’t pitch to VCs and they don’t want their money. They focus on your product and your customers, not on your visibility on [the] startup scene,” wrote the commentator.
Related: After 25 years of constructing my very own tech company, here’s what I’ve realized about funding
VC-backed growth vs. bootstrapped growth
One of the largest misconceptions about bootstrapped startups is that they are the identical as small businesses that only aim to remain small. That’s not normally the case – it definitely wasn’t the case for me. I built Jotform from a side hustle alongside a full-time job to the corporate it’s today, with greater than 25 million users worldwide and over 660 employees across five continents.
Bootstrapping startups are literally just as ambitious as those who accept investment. While their growth could also be slower and more gradual than in the event that they received an enormous injection of capital from enterprise capital, they each have the identical goal: to turn out to be a big, successful company.
Venture capital-funded startups often face pressure to grow quickly. That can—and does—work, especially if you happen to’re comfortable handing over the CEO role to someone who has experience leading that form of expansion. But in case your goal is to remain and grow together with your company, such rapid change could be very difficult.
When bootstrapping, your growth ought to be regular and continuous. I often take into consideration my two oldest children, now 6 and eight, once they first began learning basketball. When they began training two years ago, they didn’t know the right way to dribble the ball and their shots didn’t even come near the basket. But over time, they got higher and higher.
Related topics: What I wish I had known before I began my startup
I have not taken my kids to practice for the past few years because I need them to turn out to be skilled basketball players (although I would not complain if that happens). I take them because playing has made them stronger, built their confidence, and taught them discipline. But the very fact is, it takes time to improve. The effect would not have been the identical in the event that they had been shooting hoops from morning to nighttime for a month – it is the consistency that built it.
The same goes for bootstrapping. You cannot make a product successful overnight by spending tens of millions of dollars to rent tons of of employees and run tons of ads. It takes time to construct a superb product, and it takes time to learn to be a superb CEO. If you propose to be each wealthy and king, bootstrapping, to make use of Wasserman’s words, is the technique to go.
There are still numerous misconceptions about bootstrapping, mostly because bootstrapped firms do not get as much attention as those who go the VC route. But through consistent growth, they will – and do – reach the identical heights, often in a more sustainable, long-term way.
