Or for those of us, the shares of own Take care of.
The motion seems fat.
You may do not forget that a jury was unanimously awarded Prkr Compensation in the quantity of $ 173 million in comparison with Qualcomm in 2013.
After all, in 1999 they were shown internal e -mails from Qualcomm leaders like this: “The truth is that parking life has stumbled into something revolutionary.” And at the moment this for the CEO of Qualcomm: “This is a critical technology that is we have to land. “
You can see that every thing is ready This video I’ve already linked myself.
Instead of licensing the technology of Prkr, which ultimately lived in literally billions of mobile phones – Qualcomm within the unanimous perspective of the jury stole it.
It had taken a decade for the case to be brought before a jury. Giants like Qualcomm can afford legal talents which might be really good within the delay.
But there it was: 173 million US dollars for the sooner use of mental property and a license fee that should be negotiated over your entire use. The judge looked as if it would agree.
And then six months later, out of the blue, he threw the decision.
What happened?
Today Prkr was published what it means is the primary of a four-episode video series “Against the Giants”.
The greater importance – and why it could achieve some traction, not less than with inventor and patent impact – is that Qualcomm just isn’t the one tech giant that squeezes the small inventor, which can afford for many years of legal disputes to implement their patents. What, other than the proven fact that you’re really un -American and unfair, we are able to influence our global competitiveness.
According to “Episode 1” by “Against the Giants”, which I’m currently doing for the primary time observedQualcomm was a standard visitors to the Parkersion website. Not a giant surprise there. A couple of days after the Qualcomm CEO organized a fundraiser for Obama, there was a visit from a pc within the White House. And a number of days later, the judge appointed by Obama threw the judgment.
I can be amazed if the president had a direct participation. He stays my hero. But was certainly one of the helpers that night, which was convinced by Qualcomms CEO that Prkr’s lawsuit threatened national security?
We may not have heard the tip.
I just asked Chatgpt: “What is the status of Parkersion Patent’s lawsuits?”
Parking resort was involved in several patent enforcement measures. Here one can find a brief update of the status of a few of your key lawsuits:
- Parkersion v. Qualcomm: The Federal Circuit recently reversed an earlier judgment without improvement and rejected the case for further proceedings to the district court. This implies that the case before the Florida district court continues.
- Parkersion v. LG electronics: This case was exposed to the ultimate determination within the Qualcomm case.
- Parkersion v. Mediatek: The case is currently pending, whereby a hearing of constructing negotiations for January 26, 2024 is planned and a negotiation date for April 14, 2025 is about.
- Parkersion v. Realtek: This can be pending, whereby a hearing for construction work is planned for January 26, 2024 and a negotiation date for March 17, 2025 is about.
Parking resort continues to actively pursue its patented enforcement measures to guard his patented technology.
Then I asked: “What was the result of the building hearing of MediaTek and Realtek on January 26, 2024?”
January 26, 2024 claimed constructing listings for the Park Servision Falls against Mediatek and Realtek Favorable decisions for parking rental. The court adopted the proposed claims of parking sore for many controversial conditions in each cases.
The stock could still go to zero. Or conceivable to five or good. . . Who knows?
I even have a ridiculous in my life.
