Saturday, April 19, 2025

Are “Clean Girl” and “Hot Girl Walks” only renamed the weight-reduction plan culture?

Image by Ron Lach

You have seen all of them over your feed-#Cleegirl routines with damp skin, rolls, minimalist aesthetics and pastel loungewear. Or #hotgirlwalks, where women are in cute athleisers while listening to affirmations or self -help leverage casts. Everything on the surface appears to be emphatic to even be healthy. Who doesn’t wish to feel polished and spiritually strong?

But dig slightly deeper, and a few people start asking: Are these trends really about health and self -care or simply another choice to sell us the usual weight-reduction plan culture in a fresh, instantifiable package? Because in all her strenuous mood, the “clean” girl and the “hot” girl aesthetics still center a certain sort of body, discipline and lifestyle. So the query isn’t only what these trends appear to be, but what they really mean.

The wellness shines … or one other disguise?

Wellness culture has change into the brand new face of what was previously known as a weight-reduction plan. Instead of low-fat yoghurt and calorie counts, we get Matcha lattes, intuitive movements and “intestinal health”. It feels Integrative. It Noise Mindful. But the core message has often not modified: smaller, more beautiful and more controlled.

The aesthetic “clean girl” is commonly described as natural, effortless beauty. But what isn’t said is how much effort (and money) it actually needs. Seras, skincare tools, specific outfits and the kind of facial symmetry, which is commonly only praised in the event that they match white, thin beauty standards. It is less about being “clean” in every literal sense, and more about polished, calm and, let’s be honest, socially acceptable.

Then there may be the “hot girl walk” that positioned movement as an instrument for mental health. Theoretically, that is great. But what number of wellness trends quickly turns into one other aesthetics: tinted legs, every day progress updates and subtle pressure, “health” for a web-based audience. Suddenly it isn’t nearly feeling good. It’s about looking good while do it.

When it involves health, why does it look so homogeneous?

One of probably the most meaningful signs that something is rooted in dietary culture? It excludes. Not intentionally, perhaps, but consistently. The women who were praised as “clean” or “hot” in these trends often look remarkably similar: thin, white or light -skinned, conventional attractive, capable and financially comfortable.

Where are the ladies with pimples, messy hair, visible disabilities or full -time jobs that don’t enable slow morning routines and aesthetic walks at a gold hour? Where are the individuals who live in bodies that don’t slot in shape and never change into?

Wellness, which only looks on a certain path, isn’t wellness. It’s branding. And like several branding rooted within the body image, one side of the shame for many who don’t shop or not.

Image by Daniel Reche

Authorization … or control?

Nothing is inherently flawed to feel good in your body. Movement could be healing. Skin care could be fun. Rituals can offer structure in a chaotic world. But when trends begin to shine what “good” looks like, they feel less empty and more like old rules in latest clothes.

Clean food became intuitive food, which became belly healing. Training plans became a “joyful movement”. Thinness became “tinted”. The language shifts, however the obsession with control, optimization and visual perfection often stays.

It is identical internalized print that’s renamed soft lighting and TikK -Voice -Oover. And if you happen to are continuously wondering whether you do it “right” if you happen to feel such as you buy more, eat less or higher, then it is probably not about wellness in any respect.

The problem with aesthetic well -being

Aesthetic well -being makes people feel like health is something they will do see. But real well -being is commonly invisible. It’s chaotic. It doesn’t all the time appear to be clear skin, suitable sets or a curated playlist. And it’s different for everybody.

If we mix our self-esteem with the appearance-we call it “hot”, “clean” or “good”-we risk reducing complex experiences into marketable checklists. And then the authorization becomes performance. It is especially frustrating how these trends often say that they’re “for everyone” in the event that they clearly don’t. They create a hierarchy of what is taken into account healthy, desirable or disciplined, and ashamed of those that cannot adapt or not.

Can we get these trends back?

Not the whole lot is lost. You can enjoy one Hot girl walk without shopping in perfectionism. You can love skincare without subscribing to Eurocentric ideals of beauty. The secret’s awareness – knowing where the messaging exceeds the limit of support to shame.

Ask yourself: Do I feel higher in my body or worse? Do I do that because I like myself or because I attempt to repair myself? Would I still do this if no one saw it?

If the reply to self -knowledge, joy or real care is rooted, you might be probably on the suitable track. But in terms of performance, control or attitude into the aesthetics of one other person, you may have every right to thrust back.

Do you’re thinking that that trends similar to “Clean Girl” and “Hot Girl Walks” are helpful types of self -care or simply a special version of the weight-reduction plan cladding?

Read more:

5 ways to save lots of food with dietary restrictions

Skipping breakfast could save your wallet, but hurt your brain

Latest news
Related news

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here