Goodbye, Pitta
It was a sunny afternoon once I dropped off the gorgeous bird in a wooded park in the course of the concrete jungle of a city. The pitta bird is a rare sight in tropical forests, even to the trained eye of bird watchers. And yet, just just a few hours earlier, she was sitting on the window of my apartment, in a busy metropolis filled with traffic and hundreds of thousands of pedestrians, miles from home.
I called her Pitta, somewhat unoriginally. I hope she survives.
Biodiversity loss is one in every of the five best global risks. This is based on “The Global Risks Report 2020from the World Economic Forum. Of these top five risks, three were environmental. The numbers are stark: the general populations of untamed animal species have fell by 68% between 1970 and 2016And One million animal and plant species at the moment are threatened with extinction. This deterioration of biodiversity and the associated Ecosystem services is the combined results of land and sea use changes, direct exploitation, climate change and pollution.
Let’s explore why institutional investors should protect ecosystems and biodiversity and the way sustainable investment strategies that provide risk mitigation and value creation opportunities may help achieve this.
The argument for sustainable investing
1. Institutional investors have a fiduciary responsibility Manage assets in the perfect interests of the client.
Failure to think about long-term investment aspects, including financially material environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria, is a breach of fiduciary duty, based on the FO PRI report 2019.
2. The annual monetary value of ecosystem services is a whopping $125 to $140 trillion. That’s multiple and a half times global GDP.
A wide range of investable sectors depend on natural resources and ecosystem services and might potentially have negative impacts on biodiversity. These include agriculture, fisheries, natural resources, fast paced consumer goods (FMCG) corporations, forestry and utilities, amongst others.
3. Can sustainable investing reduce risk and increase returns? The research says yes.
Several studies and Meta-studies suggest that ESG issues could be financially meaningful to corporations’ operational performance, reduce the price of capital and potentially increase alpha. Collaborating with corporations on ESG issues can create value for each investors and corporations.
Which investment approaches, asset classes and methods can be found?
Responsible investing strategies range from social investing with partial market returns to affect investing with market-oriented return targets to full ESG integration for long-term value creation. Sustainable investments now extend across the whole range of asset classes that make up diversified investment portfolios. These include stocks, bonds, real estate, private equity and enterprise capital. A growing variety of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with an ESG focus are also available. Accordingly, sustainable investment assets in Europe, the United States, Japan, Canada and Australasia amounted to $35.3 trillion at the tip of 2020 “Global Sustainable Investment Alliance Investment Review: 2020.”
Alignment, Integration and Engagement: A Necessary Paradigm Shift
“A sustainable investment strategy consists of building blocks familiar to institutional investors: a balance between risk and return and a thesis about which factors strongly influence a company’s financial performance.” – Sara Bernow, Bryce Plumber and Clarisse Magnin, Mckinsey
Therefore, for a client looking for risk-adjusted returns with a deal with biodiversity, the investment strategy must be aligned with their objectives and time frames and integrate these longer-term risks and aspects into their investment processes.
Complete integration expands investor objectives beyond risk reduction to value creation and have to be implemented across the whole economic system value chain.
Time frame: Pension and sovereign wealth funds in addition to other institutional investors have long investment horizons. However, fund managers and investees measure profitability on much shorter schedules – quarterly, for instance. This conflict of interest requires a change of perspective.
Explicit costs of natural capital and externalities: Understanding the worth of each the impacts and dependencies of natural capital helps economic and financial decision-makers assess whether these issues impact their institutions and make more informed decisions. The Dasgupta Review of 2021 recommends that biodiversity be valued as an economic asset and never as a free resource so as to stop its depletion.
The cost of externalities: On the opposite side of the coin are the environmental impacts of services or products that should not explicitly included in the worth – Appearances – can affect the general economy and potentially investors’ long-term total returns. The solution? Internalize externalities through market-based instruments equivalent to taxes, regulatory instruments equivalent to vehicle emissions and safety standards, or voluntary instruments equivalent to emission reduction agreements.
The value of commitment: By opening a dialogue, investors and institutions can encourage corporations to make use of natural resources more sustainably and efficiently, ensuring that their current returns should not taken over by their future returns.
Political dialogue: Whether institutional investors generate sustainable returns and create value is influenced by each market efficiency and the effectiveness of public policy. The EU taxonomy for sustainable activities is a critical example. Investors can work with regulators, standard setters, stock exchanges and other stakeholders to create a more robust and stable economic system that higher integrates ESG into financial decision-making.
Final thoughts
Let’s return to Pitta. What could be done? Various financing initiatives are emerging that leverage public sector and development finance for sustainable agriculture, biodiversity conservation and the blue economy. Many of those deal with vulnerable developing countries. The Asian Development Bank and the World Bank, amongst other institutions, are developing modern financing products to support these efforts. The The World Bank’s five-year, $150 million Wildlife Conservation BondFor example, it’s a type of thematic biodiversity investing that goals to guard South Africa’s black rhinos while providing investors with a competitive return based on achieving conservation success indicators.
So the hassle is underway. Let’s just hope they’re enough.
Stay protected, Pitta. We will give our greatest.
If you enjoyed this post, do not forget to subscribe.
