Entrepreneurial Investor’
Much of the philosophical architecture of contemporary finance – modern portfolio theory (MPT), the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), etc. – relies on the underlying rationality of the collective human inputs that drive market movements. Markets are fundamentally efficient, conventional theory holds, and investors generally wish to maximize return for a given level of risk and make their investment decisions accordingly.
But over the a long time, the work of Herbert Simon, Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Robert J. Shiller and Richard H. Thaler – to call just a few – challenged this orthodoxy and showed that the behavior of markets and investors is commonly rather more ambiguous than these theories suggest.
Whatever investors did, these researchers found, they didn’t follow the “rational model” prescribed in the traditional financial world.
Of course, Kahneman, Shiller and Co. weren’t preaching to an empty audience. It was never particularly difficult to seek out evidence of collective human bias and irrationality in finance. But the worldwide financial crisis and the whole lot that got here after it have further increased interest in behavioral economics.
It’s not hard to see why. In the shadow of the Great Recession, financial markets have exhibited too many anomalies, from negative rates of interest to the GameStop fiasco, for conventional theory to elucidate. And within the seek for alpha, many have come to consider that MPT and its associated tools are incongruent and potentially counterproductive.
Since its launch in fall 2011, it has presented the research of the leading minds in behavioral economics in addition to their critics, while our own staff have contributed their evaluation and perspectives on the subject. What follows is a number of a few of our most influential contributions. Together, these contributions provide a glimpse into the evolution of monetary thought over the past decade.
While behavioral economics has shown that modern finance sometimes fails to account for market phenomena, it has not yet developed an integrated model to switch it. Whether it will ever occur is an open query, but perhaps not a decisive one: given the complexity of twenty first century markets, it could be wishful pondering to assume that a theoretical framework will ever cover the total range of market activity. But as this collection shows, conventional finance through a behavioral lens can at the least provide essential insights.
For higher rankings, avoid these five behavioral mistakes
Daniel Kahneman: Four keys to raised decisions
Richard H. Thaler: To intervene or to not intervene
Robert J. Shiller on bubbles, reflexivity and narrative economy
Meir Statman on Coronavirus, Behavioral Finance: The Second Generation and more
In an interview with Paul McCaffrey, Meir Statman discusses, amongst other things, the second generation of behavioral economics, how it will probably influence our understanding of artificial intelligence (AI) and environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing, and the way we reply to the recent coronavirus epidemic.
Renaissance of the lively stock market
The Discovering Markets Hypothesis (DMH)
What does loss aversion mean for investors? Not much
Contrary to popular belief in behavioral economics, the importance of loss aversion may even be overestimated, in accordance with David Gal.
Have the behaviorists gone too far?
How to read financial news: homeland, affirmation and racial bias
Race and Inclusion Now: Action Points for Investment Management
If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe.
Photo credit: ©Getty Images/ Highwaystarz-Photography
