The rise in retail investor activity in public markets is a well-documented phenomenon. Digital teaching platforms and online learning channels are the predominant drivers. They often give users the illusion that they will compete with large institutional investors and profit from market volatility.
According to the web investment platform, retail investors accounted for 25% of total stock trading volume in 2021, almost double the share reported a decade earlier Public. In February 2023, retail investors reached a brand new all-time high in weekly inflows across all online platforms, with $1.5 billion price of retail assets flowing into the market in a single week, Public reports.
Unfortunately, but predictably, only a small minority of retail investors make cash from day trading: between 10% and 30% per quarter.
Yet lots of of thousands and thousands of dollars are invested every single day through online trading platforms, including those who allow it dangerous binary options trading. Many of those platforms appeal to the identical human instincts as sports betting platforms, emphasizing the adrenaline of “winning” and “getting rich,” as if day trading were a licensed money-making tool. Numerous financial influencers (finfluencers) spread “magic” trading tricks on social media and push uninformed small investors much more into day trading.
Easy access to online platforms with limited controls creates an uneven playing field with institutional investors. Retail investors are effectively competing with skilled institutional traders who’ve access to world-class research and data. The result’s the danger of an awesome amount of capital chasing the identical opportunities in public markets, potentially exacerbating stock market bubbles GameStop short squeeze.
Private markets offer an alternate risk-return profile
Private market opportunities offer an alternate risk-return profile that may gain advantage a retail investor’s portfolio through diversification. But these opportunities are sometimes missed and personal investors are underrepresented.
Several aspects create a barrier to personal markets that’s difficult for retail investors to beat. Firstly, private offers are only available accredited investors, who reach certain asset or income limits. Second, most private market opportunities, including private equity funds, have high minimum investment requirements. These requirements conflict with traditional portfolio allocation recommendations of 5% to 10% in alternative assets.
Finally, a general lack of knowledge and education about private markets perpetuates the parable that personal market investments are inherently “riskier.”
SEC Rules 506(b) and 506(c) Severely restrict access to personal offerings and permit access only to accredited investors and a limited variety of non-accredited investors. The SEC’s intent is to guard investors with limited financial knowledge or limited assets available to take a position in less liquid investments. Less sophisticated investors are considered more vulnerable in private markets because investment opportunities are highly customized.
However, inexperienced investors can access online trading platforms, including those that provide binary options. These platforms are built and promoted in the identical way as sports betting web sites. Investors on these platforms are inclined to lose money, data shows, and the percentages are stacked against them in these markets, that are characterised by massive information asymmetry.
Are public markets really less dangerous?
Ultimately, the ideas that public markets are inherently less dangerous or that anyone with a laptop and an online connection is a knowledgeable investor are unsuitable. Behavioral finance has already debunked the parable that folks are rational investors. We know that public market bubbles are exacerbated by investor “heuristics.” Such bubbles could have develop into larger and more frequent since retail investor participation increased.
Something also must be said about higher minimum allocations. While there are some investment vehicles within the private market with minimum investments of $25,000, most opportunities require investments within the order of thousands and thousands of dollars. If a standard portfolio invests 10% in alternatives, an investor must hold significant amounts of investable assets to realize access to a single private market opportunity. It’s hard to assume this not limiting diversification opportunities.
Private market investments, particularly private loans, can provide returns that will not be subject to day by day market fluctuations, providing much-needed diversification to an investor’s portfolio. Private markets are more insulated from day by day investor sentiment as their performance is driven by more fundamental aspects. They provide patient capital with the chance to deploy it toward professionally sourced opportunities which might be less correlated to public market fluctuations.
Education is the important thing
In this text I simply raise the query of whether the present regulatory framework is conducive to raised consumer welfare. This doesn’t mean that retail investors must be allowed seamless access to personal markets. In fact, education is essential. “An Introduction to Alternative Lending“, which I co-edited Philip Clements for the Research Foundation, is introduction to credit. Service providers that provide private investments should offer more transparency and education to personal investors.
Ultimately, a more balanced investment strategy that features private market allocations – subject to informed investor decisions – could potentially provide a more stable and diversified portfolio.
Photo credit: ©Getty Images / Rudenkoi
