Updated on May 20: Article originally posted on May 18.
With the launch of the brand new iPad Pro, Apple has shifted focus from the Mac platform to its tablet line. With a big screen, thin construction, and portable keyboards, the iPad’s marketing promise that “your next computer isn’t a computer” comes tantalizingly close.
Update: Sunday, May 19:
Mark Gurman has highlighted the challenge Apple faces in attempting to separate the iPad and Mac platforms. Writing for the Power On newsletterHe argues that the 2 families of devices can be higher served by expanding the differences and allowing the Mac and iPad to excel at what they each do best:
“The Mac will always have more powerful chip options, larger displays, a built-in keyboard and trackpad, fans for heavy workloads, more ports, and better battery life. The iPad will always be much more portable, better for gaming, superior for watching video, and a device that can take photos and video. It’s time for Apple to make both the iPad and the Mac as capable as possible.”
Apple continues to attempt to bring the 2 systems closer together, allowing iPadOS apps to run on MacOS. Developers even have the choice to create universal apps that run on each platforms. Of course, the hardware may not match what an app expects. The Mac platform doesn’t have a touchscreen, while the iPad family doesn’t have a touchpad or physical keyboard, unless you are willing to extend the associated fee of running the iPad and buy recent peripherals that provide those services.
After years of trying, the potential of a unified platform seems far-off at this stage. If Gurma is correct, it is time for Apple to give attention to the person merits of every device.
Update: Monday, May 20.
Is the iPad Pro a worthy alternative on your MacBook Pro, which keeps you tied to your desk? The tablet’s reviews may beat across the bush on this topic, however it’s clear that those that have taken the time to critically analyze the tablet don’t think it’s ready for that role:
Mat Gallagher from T3 acknowledges in its review the performance that the M4 chipset offers, but in addition acknowledges the dearth of software to adequately capture that performance:
“As a general tablet operating system, the current iPad operating system works really well. However, for those who are used to macOS and want to use the iPad like a Mac, it can feel limiting. Apple introduced Stage Manager for the iPad last year, which makes the operating system look more like a Mac. You get the familiar taskbar at the bottom and minimized windows on the side. This is a step in the right direction, but I’d like to see more.”
For an extended time, Apple’s solution gave the impression to be a paired system that allowed macOS apps to run on an iPad either through emulation or dual-booting between the 2 operating systems. Tony Polanco for Tom’s Guide unsure if this can be a practical option for the time being:
“I’ve had many conversations with friends and colleagues about Apple considering bringing macOS to iPads — especially tablets with an M-series chip. That would certainly eliminate the issues I have when using iPadOS for productivity. However, having two different operating systems on one computer could be confusing, and potentially make the iPad less of a tablet and more of a 2-in-1 Mac. I’m not sure that’s the answer, but it’s something I always think about when the topic of iPads as laptop replacements comes up.”
While Apple’s iPad Pro offers the very best performance and tablet experience Apple has to supply, as a full-fledged system it still falls in need of the MacBook Pro usually and the Mac platform as an entire.
But Apple’s dogma across the iPad will hamper the tablet platform, despite the fact that the Mac platform can easily solve the identical problem – the flexibleness of third-party applications.
While Apple has equipped the iPad Pro with the brand new desktop-class M4 chipset months ahead of its expected shipping in Mac hardware, unlocking the potential of that chipset is a serious challenge. Those reviewing the most recent iPad Pro mention the M4 and that iPadOS is not the very best environment. David Phelan of Forbes:
“While it’s powerful, in some ways it feels like it’s limited by the software. While iPadOS has changed massively with the introduction of Stage Manager, which makes it easier to use multiple apps, nothing compares to macOS in that regard. The new Magic Keyboard is light and comfortable and makes typing a dream. But it still can’t compete with a Mac laptop.”
The biggest consideration, nonetheless, is the closed nature of iPadOS. Anything you need to do needs to be approved by Apple before it might run on a tool, distribution is simply through the App Store, and any revenue generated is subject to Apple’s 30 percent share.
(There is a limitation in Europe as iPadOS is classed as a “gatekeeper” service and must take steps to comply with the Digital Markets Act and open the platform. However, for a single developer, the method to accomplish that is lengthy and complicated.)
Compare that to MacOS. The Mac platform does have an app store, however it’s not the one strategy to the platform. Although Apple has a payment system that may be used, no developer is forced to make use of that system. And there are not any restrictions on what you’ll be able to program and distribute on the Mac platform. To give a recent example, retro emulation apps have long been a staple of the Mac platform, but until recently Apple had a blanket ban on all these apps on iPhones and iPads. No matter how well they were programmed, Apple deemed them unsuitable.
While you’ll be able to argue about elements just like the user interface, touchscreens, trackpads, on-screen keyboards, and cellular connectivity, the important thing advantage any Mac has over any iPad is the openness of the system. If you need to do something on MacOS to reap the benefits of the total power of the chipset, there are not any limits…unlike the iPad, where Apple monitors your every move.
Read the most recent headlines on iPad, Mac and iPhone in Forbes’ weekly Apple news roundup…