For much of the last two years Caitlin Clark was the center of the faculty basketball world.
Now, like NBA Hall of Famer Larry Bird 45 years ago, Clark finds himself unwillingly at the middle of discussions about race and race her transition to skilled basketball. Although Clark hasn’t said anything to fuel the black-and-white narrative surrounding her meteoric rise, there are talks of a double standard.
“I believe it’s a giant deal. I believe loads of people might say it isn’t about black and white, but for me it’s,” Las Vegas Aces star A’ja Wilson said when asked concerning the racial element to Clark’s popularity and before her recently signed two major endorsement deals. “It’s often because as a black woman you possibly can be top-notch in who you might be, but possibly that is something people don’t need to see.”
“They don’t see it as marketable, so it doesn’t matter how hard I work. It doesn’t matter what we all do as black women, we are still swept under the rug. That’s why it boils in my blood when people say it’s not about race, because it is.”
To be clear, Clark is a tough court veteran from Iowa. Bird was a hard-court veteran from Indiana State. And like Bird, Clark captivated audiences and brought unmatched attention to women’s basketball together with his ability to attain from every corner of the court.
Neither Bird nor Clark were the primary great white skilled basketball players. Jerry West is the actual NBA logo, and before Clark, Sue Bird and Breanna Stewart were among the many long list of talented white WNBA players.
But the game might be enhanced by a heated rivalry, especially in terms of race.
Clark’s rise was matched by an on-court bravery that made her must-see television as she led the Hawkeyes to back-to-back NCAA Championship game appearances. When Bird led the Sycamores to the 1979 title game, he faced Magic Johnson in certainly one of the most-watched games in NCAA Tournament history.
In Iowa, Clark’s The on-court rival within the NCAA Tournament was former LSU star Angel Reese. Then she faced off against women’s juggernaut South Carolina and coach Dawn Staley. The matchups created the form of social media moments that captivated audiences no matter gender.
The encounters also led to ongoing discussions concerning the role race plays within the treatment of Clark, a white woman on “America’s Heartland,” in comparison with black colleagues like Reese.
Clark has said she and Reese are only parts of a bigger movement.
“I would say Angel and I have always been great competitors,” Clark said before Iowa’s Elite Eight matchup with Reese and LSU in March. “I think Angel would say the same thing, like women’s basketball isn’t just about us. That’s not the only thing that’s competitive about our game, and that’s what makes it so good. We need several people to be really good.”
Still, the racial debate over perceived slights toward black players or favoritism toward Clark won’t go away the No. 1 alternative within the WNBA Draft is preparing for its first regular season game on Tuesday night when Indiana plays Connecticut.
“I think it’s brought new fans or maybe returning fans to women’s college basketball. Partly because of Clark. But also, you know, because of the rivalry between LSU and Iowa,” said Victoria Jackson, a sports historian and clinical associate professor of history at Arizona State University.
“There are basketball reasons,” Jackson said, “but there are also racial reasons why Clark was able to reach a completely different stratosphere than the players before her.”
Because of the perceived double standards, almost every little thing involving Clark is named into query:
– Clark’s first preseason game was streamedHowever, not Reese’s.
– Clark gets an endorsement deal. Other established black stars, not a lot.
– If Reese talks trash, it is taken into account unsportsmanlike. When Clark does it, she’s competitive.
— Reese received some backlash for going to the Met Gala before a game, raise questions Would there have been the identical form of scrutiny if Clark had graced the red carpet?
Wilson, who signed with Gatorade last week and announced Saturday she was getting a Nike signature shoe, and others have cited firms clamoring to work with Clark for example of the disparity in treatment of players .
Clark’s take care of Nike reportedly calls for $28 million over eight years – the highest-paying endorsement deal for a female basketball player and including a signature shoe. Before Wilson’s announcement on Saturday, Elena Delle Donne, Sabrina Ionescu and Stewart were the WNBA’s only other energetic players with a signature shoe – all white.
Perception goes beyond endorsements.
While Clark’s preseason debut was available on the WNBA League Pass streaming app, a post from the WNBA was published on the X platform incorrectly stated that each one gamesincluding the Chicago Sky debuts of Reese and fellow former rookie Kamilla Cardoso, would even be available.
So, a Fan present The game was broadcast live to tell the tale Sky. It received greater than 620,000 views.
In one (n Apology post explained As for why Sky’s game wasn’t also available, the WNBA said Clark’s game was available as a part of a limited free preview of its streaming app.
There have also been racial elements to the way in which Clark is treated on social media in comparison with others, particularly Reese.
Reese, who previously spoke online concerning the criticism she received, was recently attacked again after she missed a preseason workout to attend the Met Gala. Clark has also been the topic of online criticism, but apparently to not the identical extent as Reese.
Online hate speech accounts for about 1 percent of all sports-related social media posts, in line with Daniel Kilvington, course leader in media and cultural studies at Leeds Beckett University in Leeds, England.
“While that may sound quite low, consider how much traffic there is online and how many posts are made every day,” said Kilvington, who studies the issue using the game of football in his work with the Tackling Online Hate in Football research group has. “One percent is therefore 1% too high, as athletes are prime targets for hate speech, harassment and death threats simply for playing a game they love.”
But as Clark’s popularity grows, so does the controversy. Jackson believes it’s a great time to debate it openly.
“I don’t know how many times I’ve heard and described her as a generational talent,” the ASU professor said. “And every time we do cases like this, I immediately think: Who are the opposite generational talents that we had? And I believe all too often you can put the athletes in that category who were black women who didn’t get that lavish attention. And especially the form of crossover saturation amongst most people that Caitlin Clark has experienced.
“There are overlapping, overlapping reasons for this. But I think we can’t help but think about it if the goal is to treat athletes equally in this sport.”
___
AP Sports Writer Mark Anderson and AP Reporter Corey Williams contributed.
