A federal court has approved a Biden administration request to increase the implementation deadline for student loan forgiveness and other relief under a landmark settlement agreement.
The settlement, which sought to resolve a long-running class-action lawsuit over stalled applications for student debt relief under a program for defrauded borrowers, was expected to end in $6 billion in relief for greater than 200,000 borrowers. According to the terms of the agreement, the Ministry of Education must have accomplished the implementation by the top of January.
But nearly a 3rd of borrowers included within the settlement still haven’t received the debt relief they deserve. As a result, the parties found themselves back in court last week. Following a judge’s ruling last week, the department now has several months to implement student loan forgiveness required under the agreement.
Here’s the newest.
The Department of Education didn’t implement student loan forgiveness and other severance relief by the deadline
The settlement agreement needs to be a final solution to this Sweet v. Cardona Litigation, a long-running class motion lawsuit originally filed against the Trump administration over 1000’s of stalled or arbitrarily rejected loan forgiveness applications under the Borrower Defense to Repaid program. Borrower defense can eliminate federal student loan debt for many who have been victimized by their school through fraud, false guarantees, or misrepresentations about essential facets of a program corresponding to admissions, educational services, or profession prospects.
In November 2022, after years of litigation that continued into the Biden administration, the scholar loan borrowers group and the Department of Education reached a settlement agreement that was approved by a federal court. Under the terms of that agreement, greater than 200,000 individuals who had previously claimed credit protection and enrolled in certainly one of several dozen designated schools would receive full relief from their applicable federal student loan debt, in addition to refunds of prior payments and a few credit repair.
The Ministry of Education should complete the implementation Sweet However, the department and sophistication attorneys agreed that tens of 1000’s of borrowers had not received loan forgiveness or other advantages related to the settlement by that court-approved deadline.
Borrowers took the Education Department back to court to force implementation of student loan forgiveness
Last month launched the Project on Predatory Student Lending – the legal organization that represents borrowers within the Sweet against Cardona Case – filed a motion to implement the previously approved settlement agreement. The project accused the department of violating its obligations under that agreement and causing harm to borrowers in the method.
“Class members are suffering serious, ongoing harm as a result of the department’s failures,” the project wrote in its Movement. Attorneys noted that borrowers expected to receive settlement relief by January so that they could “pay for essentials like health care or buying a car.” Other borrowers were subjected to “unlawful” collection practices by the department’s contracted student loan servicers on debts that were not purported to exist on the time, causing confusion and stress.
The attorneys noted, “When student loan borrowers fail to meet their deadlines, the consequences are immediate and drastic,” including lack of access to federal student loan forgiveness programs. When borrowers fail to pay their federal student debt, credit damage and involuntary debt collection actions corresponding to wage garnishments and Social Security profit offsets can occur. “The Department of Education, which allows such draconian measures for its constituents, should not be allowed to shirk responsibility for its own missed deadlines,” the motion states.
Court extends deadline for student loan forgiveness
At a hearing last week, Department of Education lawyers acknowledged that many borrowers haven’t received the relief they’re entitled to under the Department of Education Sweet v. Cardona Many of them are still waiting for student loan forgiveness. The department noted that the delays were because of a wide range of administrative issues, including the necessity to track and process complicated consolidation histories, multiple loans to process transfers and complicated transaction histories related to many individual student loans.
In response, the federal judge overseeing the settlement declined to impose penalties against the department presently. Instead, he prolonged the deadline for officials to implement the settlement agreement.
The judge “reluctantly accepted the department’s request to extend the deadline for awarding full compensation to August 31, 2024,” the Project on Predatory Student Lending said. However, the court also placed additional obligations on the department to “ensure accountability.” These include:
- Progress report hearings with the court in May, June and July to review the status of implementation of settlement relief.
- Bi-weekly, out-of-court, face-to-face meetings of all parties.
- Appointment of the FSA Ombudsman – a dispute resolution arm inside the department – because the designated contact for Sweet v. Cardona Class members.
Borrowers who’ve questions on the settlement schedule updates can accomplish that Contact the Project on Predatory Student Lending. In addition, the department has arrange a dedicated email address for inquiries to the FSA Ombudsman in relation to Sweet v. Cardona Settlement: sweet@ed.gov.