How have single stock return ETFs performed to this point?

The aspect of tax efficiency must even be taken under consideration. Unless you hold these ETFs in a registered account equivalent to a Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), or other tax-advantaged account, these distributions may lead to tax liabilities.

Depending on the structure, distributions may consist of returns of capital, dividends, peculiar income or capital gains. Return on capital is common with covered call strategies and can lower your adjusted cost basis, but that doesn’t suggest taxes disappear ceaselessly. Instead, they are sometimes postponed.

I bring this up because Canadian ETF providers are increasingly launching concentrated income products tied to individual stocks, often using moderate leverage and covered call overlays. Purpose Investments calls them Yield Shares, Harvest ETFs markets them as High Income Shares and Ninepoint Partners has its High Shares series. If you spend enough time on Reddit, YouTube, or financial web sites, you have probably seen ads for it.

The playing field is uncomplicated. For example, as an alternative of spending $41,700 to purchase 100 shares of Microsoft stock after which selling self-covered calls, you possibly can buy a single-stock return ETF that does the be just right for you. The ETF pools investors’ capital, buys the underlying stocks, often increases leverage by borrowing between 1.25 and 1.33 times, after which sells covered calls to generate premiums.

On the surface it sounds attractive. You get access to a blue chip company you already like while earning a daily monthly income. But ultimately it’s the overall return that matters. After reinvesting the distributions, is it actually higher for you than simply buying and holding the stock itself?

This is the query I desired to test. So I compared two of the older single-stock covered call ETFs with the underlying stocks on which they’re based and an equivalent Canadian Depositary Receipt (CDR). Conclusion first: The results were mixed.

How do these single stock return ETFs work?

For this experiment, I focused totally on Purpose Investments’ offering, as they were among the many first to launch single-stock return ETFs in Canada in 2022. Competing products from providers equivalent to Harvest ETFs and Ninepoint are still relatively recent and don’t yet have enough track record for meaningful evaluation.

I also intentionally focused on large-cap U.S. technology stocks because these kinds of firms are likely to primarily attract covered call strategies. There are a couple of reasons for this.

The article continues below promoting

First, the underlying stocks are very liquid, meaning the choices markets for them are extremely energetic. Investors gain access to tight bid-ask spreads, multiple expiration dates and a wide selection of strike prices. Second, a lot of these stocks are so volatile that selling covered calls can generate significant option premiums, making them lucrative.

The first example I checked out was the Purpose Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares ETF (YGOG), which relies on Alphabet. On May 7, 2026, Purpose advertised a ten.69% distribution yield on YGOG. This number is calculated by annualizing the ETF’s most up-to-date monthly distribution relative to its net asset value.

Structurally, YGOG is pretty easy. The ETF holds shares of Alphabet directly using 25% leverage. In practice, which means that for each $100 of investor capital, the fund manager borrows an extra $25. In addition, the ETF systematically sells covered calls for as much as 50% of the portfolio. This helps generate revenue while retaining some stake if Alphabet shares proceed to rise.

None of this is affordable. The basic management fee of the ETF is 0.40%, but after accounting for leverage costs and other operating costs, the actual management expense ratio (MER) rises to 1.71%, which is kind of expensive in comparison with just holding the stock itself.

What the backtest data says

I compared YGOG from January 2023 to April 2026 with two alternatives: simply buying and holding Alphabet shares (GOOGL) directly and buying the Canadian depository receipt version, the Alphabet CDR, which trades in Canadian dollars.

The CDR doesn’t charge an explicit management fee, but still experiences ongoing pressures from currency hedging costs and foreign withholding taxes on dividends, although in Alphabet’s case the dividend component is minimal given the corporate’s relatively low payout.

Source: Portfolio Visualizer

Interestingly, YGOG actually performed higher when it comes to pure total return during this particular period. The Purpose ETF earned an annual rate of interest of 58.50%, in comparison with 55.94% for the Alphabet shares themselves and 52.32% for the Alphabet CDR.