Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said he would scrap a long-standing fact-checking program and replace it with X-style community notes from users.
© 2024 Bloomberg Finance LP
The first time Lead Stories fact-checker Maarten Schenk learned of Meta’s plan to finish its partnership with independent journalists was within the social network’s press release. “We weren’t notified in advance, so it was just like, boom, this is coming to an end,” Shenk said Forbes.
Others — some who had worked for nearly a decade to combat misinformation and abuse across the corporate’s various platforms — got lower than an hour’s notice. They were surprised by the move, as were some organizations that had signed contract extensions with Meta for fact-checking just weeks earlier.
According to several fact-checkers involved within the discussions, Meta told fact-checkers that contracts with American news organizations similar to USA Today, Reuters Fact Check, AFP and the nonprofit Politifact would end in March. Contracts with international newsrooms and charities running fact-checking projects from Australia to Zambia are expected to run until the tip of the yr.
The closure of the meta-fact checking program on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp is more likely to adversely affect some newsrooms and nonprofits that had relied on it to generate revenue. Meta claimed in 2022 to have spent $100 million on this system since 2016 and expanded it to roughly 115 countries. Meta didn’t reply to a request for comment by deadline.
The company’s decision to swap independent fact-checking for community content monitoring was announced on Tuesday in a blog post from Joel Kaplan, the corporate’s recent head of worldwide policy. He wrote that a few of Meta’s content moderation policies were developed “partly in response to social and political pressure to moderate content,” and said these “increasingly complex systems” had “gone too far” and branded them “censorship “.
The claim that Meta’s fact-checking program was politically biased or amounted to censorship angered most of the fact-checkers who had worked and spoken with Meta Forbes. “Fact-checking journalism has never censored or removed posts: it adds information and context to controversial claims and debunks false reports,” said Angie Holan, director of the International Fact-Checking Network.
Indeed, Facebooks own rules Specify that only the corporate can moderate or remove posts. “We did not and could not remove content,” said Lori Robertson of Factcheck.org, one other of Meta’s third-party fact-checkers based within the United States. “All decisions on this were made by Meta.”
The abandonment of third-party fact-checking by Meta, which says it has three billion users across Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, follows Kaplan taking up as head of worldwide affairs Month. The former senior adviser to President George W. Bush and longtime Republican lobbyist replaced Nick Clegg within the role.
The move is one other in a series apparently aimed toward appeasing the brand new Trump administration. The company may even move its content moderation team from California to Texas and recently relaxed its rules Hate speech against immigrants, women and transgender people. On Monday, Zuckerberg announced that he had tapped UFC President Dana White, a outstanding Trump supporter, to his board.
In response to Meta’s fact-checking announcement: said President Trump The company has “come a long way” and speculated that Zuckerberg “probably” made the changes in direct response to threats from the president-elect. Trump had claimed without evidence that the Facebook founder swore against it within the 2020 election, and warned he would “spend the rest of his life in prison” if he intervened within the 2024 presidential election. Meta also faces a hearing before a Federal Trade Commission court April This requires the dissolution of the $1.57 billion company.
By attempting to appeal to the brand new Trump administration, Zuckerberg could arrange a possible future conflict with the European Union over moderation. Europe’s regulators already are investigate Elon Musk’s X-Over claims it violated the Digital Services Act by failing to remove posts with illegal content.
“Europe has an ever-increasing number of laws that institutionalize censorship and make it difficult to develop anything innovative there,” Zuckerberg said within the video post, during which he might be seen wearing one $900,000 watch. “The only way to curb this trend is with support from the US government.”
MORE FROM FORBES
