The meat industry has a terrible carbon footprint. While eating regimen is a private selection, could financing vegetarian products be the deciding factor that steers our consumption habits in a more sustainable direction?
That can actually be the case. Vegetarian investing has evolved from a fringe idea to an idea Unicorn territory. Once the only domain of impact investors, it’s now becoming mainstream because the foodtech sector develops. We at SustainFinance I consider investors must be careful.
Vegetarianism is becoming increasingly popular. While concerns about associated environmental degradation, health impacts and the ethics of meat consumption are the essential motivations, increasing vegetarianism can be driven by a desire for more equitable food distribution and the protection of long-established rural communities. In fact, data shows that the production of vegan and vegetarian food is more resource-efficient and fewer harmful to the environment.
The production and cultivation of animal foods are among the many essential causes of climate change. Would the common American should be replaced? For example, in the event that they reduced their beef consumption with plant-based alternatives, they would scale back their dietary carbon footprint by 96%. If your complete world switched from beef to vegetarian meals, as much as 1 / 4 of the planet’s surface could be ice-free and as much as 15% of worldwide freshwater consumption could possibly be used for other purposes or not used in any respect. Think about it: Producing one kilogram of fruit requires one-fifteenth the quantity of water corresponding to the burden of meat.
Enough food is produced so that everybody on the planet can eat well. But due to our eating habits, an excessive amount of meat is produced and consumed in wealthy countries. This, in turn, displaces our ability to grow grains and products needed for healthy diets in emerging markets. Global agricultural supply chains are also becoming increasingly longer; Many foods travel lots of of kilometers to achieve our plates, increasing our carbon footprint even further.
Big Food is big business and is just not easily destroyed. By convincing consumers to eat increasingly calories, global agribusinesses have made a profit. But the diets they promote have led to widespread obesity and an associated health crisis. They cause social costs that we’re only just starting to calculate.
Our eating regimen is addictive. While our body needs food, Big Food develops products with precise combos of sugar, salt, fat and other additives This could be just as habit-forming as tobacco or alcohol. In fact, the food supply chain has some parallels to the prescription opioid supply chain within the late Nineties and early 2000s. Grocery retailers and outlets are incentivized by Big Food to satisfy demand despite the social costs, just as doctors have been incentivized by drug manufacturers to overwrite prescriptions.
Could the mainstream agricultural and food retail industries eventually face regulatory scrutiny? The sugary foods and drinks industry within the UK has already. The crackdown on goods high in sugar was triggered by government reviews, which in turn influenced consumer demand. The meat industry could soon face the same process.
Several large, well-capitalized agribusinesses dominate the worldwide food sector. including seeds and grains Production and animal end products. They form a robust oligopoly that dictates what we eat and the way we eat it and where and the way it’s produced. They eat enormous amounts of worldwide resources and have great influence on government policyand contribute to a big gap between industrialized and emerging countries.
The pursuit of profit without considering the associated social and environmental production costs results in short-term decisions. This has consequences for our natural resources and the health and safety of our workforce. The use of fertilizers and pesticides can increase crop yields, but may also damage surrounding ecosystems. Crop yields decline as soil deteriorates. The consequence of focusing only on short-term growth can leave less developed countries facing depletion of regional resources, worsening public health and increased poverty.
What can we do concerning the excesses of Big Food? Quite loads, because it seems. As consumers and investors, we’ve the actual power to vary the present, unsustainable model for the higher. We need to teach ourselves concerning the origins of the food we eat and the resources required to supply it. We need to scale back – not necessarily eliminate – the consumption of foods which might be harmful to each us and the environment. Eating less meat, especially beef, or no meat in any respect if possible, and sourcing more food from local suppliers are big steps in the suitable direction.
Certainly there may be a “chicken or egg” element to this complete transition. If more attractive and reasonably priced vegetarian and vegan products were available, more of us would switch to one of these eating regimen. But green shoots appear. Change follows money and extra money will come as we achieve scale. The more flexitarians, vegetarians and vegans there are, the more the food industry will innovate, reducing costs and making animal-free food alternatives more accessible to more consumers.
This culture change will take time and the investment community has a key role to play. Agribusinesses make up a good portion of retirement portfolios. Fund managers must be certain that this sector is held accountable. At a minimum, fund managers should demand good governance and transparency around the corporate’s carbon emissions policies, labor practices, and consumer health and well-being. Ideally, this implies advocating at board level for a give attention to sustainability and a transparent roadmap for a less destructive, healthier and more equitable food supply chain.
The added value of all these measures is in fact based on risk reduction and ethical considerations. These are essential, but they are usually not sufficient to be certain that an investment portfolio meets our clients’ goals. An investment that meets all sustainability criteria but doesn’t generate a return is just not a “good” investment within the truest sense of the word.
How have vegetarian and vegan investments actually developed? Is there a proof of concept that demonstrates their long-term return potential? Of course, given its relative newness, the info is just not complete, but early results are promising. Since its introduction two years ago, for instance Beyond Investing’s US Vegan Climate Change (VEGN) exchange-traded fund (ETF) has rivaled the S&P 500 At the identical time, avoid corporations that contribute to animal suffering, climate change and environmental destruction. Elsewhere, food tech unicorns Beyond Meat and Oatly benefited from considerable hype leading as much as their successful initial public offerings (IPOs), at the least showing that there is robust investor interest in most of these corporations. And this investor interest is crucial.
In order to scale back the environmental impact of food production, investments must flow into more sustainable production systems. Access to such investments has historically been limited. Food technology continues to be a young industry and is subsequently largely the preserve of enterprise capitalists and personal equity firms. But Invest vegan and other corporations are pioneering a path to assist investors higher align their investments with their values.
A green revolution is changing our energy supply and waste management systems. An identical revolution must happen in global food production and in our diets. The investor community may help drive this revolution by encouraging Big Food to extend their commitment and develop into healthier and more sustainable.
If you enjoyed this post, remember to subscribe.
Photo credit: ©Getty Images / MEDITERRANEAN
