
Paris secured its bid to host the 2024 Olympic Games with the promise of hosting probably the most economical and sustainable Games in recent history.
By using existing infrastructure for 95% of events, adhering to the Paris Climate Agreement and restoring the fame of the Games, Paris set a brand new standard for future hosts.
Despite Paris’ modern approach, the issue of exorbitant costs stays in a world of wealth inequality, polarization and climate crisis. This raises the query: could a single, everlasting venue for the Games be a more sustainable solution, each economically and environmentally?
All the Games have promised an enduring legacy. Athens has expanded its subway system, London has cleaned up a big a part of its East End, Barcelona an underused seafront, but each of those Games has produced mixed results. London 2012 built only 13,000 of 40,000 promised reasonably priced homes, which a patchy legacy and a social divide that Paris is keen to avoid.
Paris – the green Olympic Games?
Paris has not built useless buildings, and the one two recent buildings being built for the Games will house the Paris basketball team and leave a big wood Olympic swimming pool in a district where 78% of kids still cannot swim. Crucially, the Games will bring this suburb of Seine-Saint-Denis, the poorest a part of France, into the middle of Paris.
9,700,000,000 USD
The amount Paris spent on hosting the Olympic Games.
Controversially, Paris has invested heavily in cleansing up the Seine, which has been off limits for swimming since 1923 as a result of high levels of bacteria. The city also intends to open three everlasting swimming spots to the general public after the Games have hosted the open water swimming events. The city has also built 55 kilometers of motorcycle paths and 25 swimming pools Renovations were carried out throughout the town.
Martin Bureau – Pool/Getty Images
Beyond this legacy, the jury continues to be out on the extent to which hosting the Olympics will generate tourist revenue within the short term. The cost of hosting Paris, at $9.7 billion, was much lower than other Olympics, but research shows that the economic advantages are unclear. The jobs are temporary and within the case of Paris, not as many tourists got here as expected. Bloomberg reports that ultimately 87% of the audience will likely be French, Parisian hotels had run away To attract visitors, Air France-KLM cut prices by 40% two days before the opening ceremony, and as a result of lower than expected bookings, the corporate expects to make a lack of 200 million euros this summer.
87% of the audience will likely be French
According to Bloomberg Newsletter.
The long-term forecast for tourism in Paris is clearer. Every image of each sport shows the backdrop of famous Paris and is etched within the viewers’ memories: beach volleyball on the Eiffel Tower, skateboarding on the Place de la Concorde, equestrian events in Versailles and browsing within the stunning Teahupoo in French Polynesia.
Lose relevance?
That backdrop will likely determine the legacy of the Games. With rankings falling at each Olympics, many are questioning their relevance, especially after the bad press as a result of corruption in Sochi and Rio and the ghost stadiums of a COVID-19 Tokyo. Although skateboarding, three-on-three basketball, squash and an annual e-sports Olympics for video games have been added, there are Doubt that a younger generation will tune in.
Wouldn’t a single, everlasting venue for the games be a more sustainable solution, each economically and ecologically?
Finally, Taylor Swift attract five times more luxury travelers than the Games in Paris, and a few ponder whether athletes might to achieve the bounds of how far they’ll proceed to interrupt world records.
However, amid global tensions, the Olympic Games are a crucial unifying event. Against the backdrop of the recent contentious European and French elections, the Games offer a world Armistice, a moment when 206 countries unite under a single flag and five colourful rings.
Welcome to Paris
France has taken the chance to reposition its capital and culture in a more inclusive framework, starting with the Video and the opening ceremony on the Seine. With no political party in charge, Paris needs the IOC now as much because the Games need Paris’ performance. And if the Paris boulevards, the Eiffel Tower and the reconstruction of Notre Dame Cathedral cannot encourage the world, what can? This redesign effort has the potential to encourage the world and redefine the Games for a brand new era.
The challenge of climate change
But there are other elements at stake, not only the relevance of the Games or their cost-effectiveness. The climate is in crisis and brings with it very specific challenges, not least the big amount of travel required every 4 years for athletes, coaches, support staff and travellers to participate within the Games.

Maja Hitij – Getty Images
July 22 and 23 were the most popular days on record, and Paris is 1.8 degrees warmer than when the Games were held in 1924. In a city not known for its air con, athletes are struggling to search out ways to chill down. And all this despite the undeniable fact that the birthplace of the Olympic Games, Greece, Battle rampant forest fires.
And then there’s the police. QR codes and security barriers have made Paris impenetrable. This requires 30,000 law enforcement officials, 18,000 French military personnel and 25,000 private security guards. General Christophe Abad said Since the tip of the Second World War, there has “never been such a massive mobilization of military forces on French soil.”
So is there an argument for holding the Olympic Games in a single place or selecting the identical venues?

LUDOVIC MARIN – AFP/Getty Images
The IOC is implementing a more streamlined process, less scandalousmore cooperative and more confident of leaving an enduring legacy in democratic countries (the subsequent Games will likely be in LA in 2028 and Brisbane in 2032).
The IOC has already named the French Alps because the host city for the 2030 Winter Olympics. This time too, France will use 95% of the present infrastructure and is the First to remain under the budget of $2 billion. Likewise, Salt Lake City in 2034 already has the present infrastructure of the scandalous 2002 Olympic Games, which was a serious pull for event organizers who wish to limit costs. However, natural snow will probably proceed to be hard to search out and no person desires to bear the environmental costs of manufacturing artificial snow.
“Never before has there been such a massive mobilization of military forces on French soil…”
General Christophe Abad, chargeable for military operations in Paris.
Some have Calls for Greece to withdraw the Summer Games endlessly, funded by the IOC, to reuse the stadiums and to work with local communities to attain the perfect possible consequence for all. Fight is that it could be much easier to arrange, less vulnerable to corruption and extravagance, and is also used for training at other times. Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank, supports to maneuver the Olympic Games permanently to Greece, a move that would give the Games stability, sustainability and a brand new meaning.
Other I believe Los Angeles could be an ideal everlasting host. As host in 1984, it’s the only city so far that has made a profit since it used existing facilities and due to high revenue from television coverage. It is a city that may handle tourists and security.
There are only two concerns about holding the Games in the identical location. First, is it feasible for residents of a number city to do that on a everlasting basis, especially when taxpayers’ money and massive inconvenience are involved? Second, and more importantly for participants, does anyone wish to forego the greater support that athletes receive when competing of their home countries? Time will tell, but for now, the traveling circus continues.
