Aren’t they dangerous?
Many financial experts assume this and are correct when it comes to volatility and the danger of everlasting capital impairment. But contrary to popular belief, stocks should not necessarily riskier than supposedly “safe” assets like U.S. Treasury bonds.
Let me explain.
The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note was 2.46% in March. So the U.S. government could borrow at an rate of interest of two.46% per yr for a decade, and we could buy Treasury bonds and lend to the U.S. government at an rate of interest of two.46% for ten years.
This is taken into account a “safe” investment because there may be virtually no risk of default by the U.S. government. So if we hold the investment to maturity, we’re roughly guaranteed an annual return of two.46% over a ten yr period.
But what if rates of interest suddenly rise to 10%? This hasn’t happened in a long time, but a ten% rate of interest is much from unprecedented for U.S. Treasury bonds. In addition, measured in a different way at ~6% or 8.3%Depending on the measurement used, inflation like today hasn’t happened for a long time. A return to that 10% rate of interest would halve the worth of our “safe” government bond.
However, let’s assume that US inflation stays at 6% over the subsequent decade and we lend our money to the federal government at 2.46% over that period. Taking under consideration the price of inflation – an rate of interest of two.46% minus 6% inflation – we’d effectively be lending at an annual rate of interest. If we did nothing in any respect and kept our money in money or hidden it under the proverbial mattress, our money would lose value in real terms by 6% per yr after inflation.
10-Year Treasury Bond Performance: A Hypothesis
Although stocks are way more volatile than bonds, this doesn’t preclude bonds from producing terrible real (and even nominal) returns for investors over short and long-term periods.
Of course, firms will also be affected by inflation and other macroeconomic events, and there isn’t a guarantee that stocks will outperform inflation – especially not within the short term, a minimum of not. Nevertheless, firms can theoretically evolve and adapt. “Theoretically” because returns on equity for non-financial firms within the US have remained remarkably stable at around 11% since World War II.) They can raise prices to pass on the price of inflation to customers, reduce costs elsewhere in the corporate, sell real estate at inflated prices, etc. Therefore, stocks as assets are higher equipped to weather the storms of inflation.
A bond, then again, is just a set contract without the opportunity of adjusting to inflation or other external influences or developments. A government bond, irrespective of how “risk-free” it’s over time, also cannot adapt to changing circumstances.
As Jeremy Siegel and Richard Thaler watch:
“[Financial disasters] that destroy the value of stocks have been linked to hyperinflation or the confiscation of financial assets, with investors often doing worse in bonds than in stocks.”
Long-term returns for stocks are higher than for other asset classes
Stock markets perform significantly higher than money and bonds over time, although with much greater short-term volatility. Over a brief investment horizon, we is likely to be higher off with money or bonds. But if we’re investing for the long run – seven years or longer – then stocks are probably a more sensible choice.
Our “risk” is due to this fact inversely related to our time horizon. In the short term, the stock market could also be chaotic, but in the long run it’s probably the most consistent generator of wealth. In fact, the Y-axis within the chart above is scaled logarithmically, so stocks have outperformed bonds by about three orders of magnitude since 1801.
For long-term investors, stocks are less volatile than you would possibly think
The annual standard deviation of U.S. stock returns between 1801 and 1995 is eighteen.15%, in comparison with 6.14% for Treasury bonds, in keeping with a study by Seals and thalers. However, over 20-year intervals, the usual deviation of U.S. stock returns is definitely lower than that of Treasury bonds: 2.76% versus 2.86%. This is despite an annual growth rate of 10.1% for stocks, in comparison with 3.7% for presidency bonds.
US Stock Returns vs. US Treasuries: Standard Deviation
The risk of stocks can’t be discounted, especially given the turmoil we’ve experienced in recent weeks and months. However, this evaluation shows that they will offer each higher returns and fewer risk than bonds over longer periods of time. And that is why it’s value keeping long-term.
If you enjoyed this post, remember to subscribe.
Photo credit: ©Getty Images/Nick Dolding
