Apple and Google must remove TikTok from their app stores by January 19 if it will not be sold to a US company.
Getty Images
TThe D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals today upheld the constitutionality of a law requiring Apple and Google to remove TikTok from their app stores by January 19 or face lots of of billions of dollars in fines in the event that they fail to accomplish that. Unless ByteDance sells TikTok by January or President Biden grants an extension, TikTok can be “effectively unavailable in the United States” until a sale occurs, the court said.
At Apple, executives including CEO Tim Cook and other executives have discussed how best to reply to the ruling and acknowledged there may be nothing they’ll do aside from comply with it. And there may be likely nothing President-elect Trump can do to stop the law from taking effect on January nineteenth. Executives’ top concern is how best to be certain that foreign nationals visiting the U.S. cannot use the app throughout the country’s borders. TikTok has been downloaded lots of of thousands and thousands of times from the App Store worldwide.
There were similar discussions at Google, whose App Store recorded greater than a billion downloads of TikTok worldwide. “Let’s just say it’s been on our minds for some time,” said a source conversant in the discussions, noting that the corporate has similar concerns to Apple. Google employees have also raised concerns about how best to handle “sideloading,” which is when users download apps from sources aside from the corporate’s App Store.
There has been some speculation at each corporations that if TikTok appeals the ruling and the case results in the Supreme Court, Trump could file an amicus transient asking for time to search out a resolution before a ban comes into force.
Apple declined to comment. Google has not yet responded to a request for comment.
In a press release, TikTok spokesman Mike Hughes said: “The Supreme Court has a proven historical track record of protecting Americans’ right to free speech, and we expect it will do just that on this important constitutional issue.” Unfortunately, that was TikTok ban was designed and enforced based on inaccurate, erroneous and hypothetical information, leading to outright censorship of the American people. “The TikTok ban, unless stopped, will silence the voices of over 170 million Americans here in the United States and around the world on January 19, 2025.”
The law upheld by the choice, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACAA), was passed by lawmakers and signed into law by President Biden in April in response to widespread concern amongst intelligence officials that the platform was getting used by the Chinese government could do that collect private information about Americans or secretly distort their information diets. In its defense of the law, the Justice Department quoted liberally Forbes Report showing that TikTok’s parent company ByteDance repeated provided information from private U.S. users in China, misled lawmakers about its data practices and monitored journalists who covered the corporate. The court also referred to this reporting in its opinion.
Some former TikTok employees celebrated the choice. An worker who left said it Forbes: “I am encouraged to see the Court favor bipartisan legislation that reflects the will of the people. Current and former employees, including me, know what TikTok has done to harm individuals and U.S. national security, and what it can do if it is not divested or banned because of close ties to the Chinese Communist Party. I look forward to President-elect Donald Trump following through on his campaign promises to put America first by upholding the rule of law.”
The law’s give attention to Apple and Google is an unusual feature of PAFACAA. Congress could have chosen to focus on TikTok directly within the law – by saying that ByteDance or its US subsidiary TikTok, Inc. can be fined billions of dollars in the event that they don’t complete the divestiture or the US -would not stop business operations throughout the deadline set by the bill. But lawmakers as a substitute placed responsibility for implementing the ban on American tech giants, on the idea that they’d be less likely than ByteDance or TikTok to violate U.S. laws.
The decision will now draw two of the United States’ strongest tech giants into the TikTok battle and force them to issue an unprecedented ban. If TikTok appeals the law to the Supreme Court, as many observers expect, the corporate could ask the court to stop a ban from taking effect while it considers the case. Apple and Google could themselves ask the court for a stay while the choice remains to be pending. But probably only a court ruling would make American corporations be ok with keeping TikTok online after January nineteenth; Otherwise there may be a risk of fines that will quickly amount to three-digit billions.
President-elect Donald Trump, who will take office a day after the Jan. 19 deadline, has said he desires to “save” TikTok from PAFACAA. Presidents cannot repeal laws without an act of Congress, although people near the president-elect have done so really helpful that he could order his Justice Department to not implement the law.
TikTok has a selection of where to take its next appeal: It could ask the complete DC Circuit, or en banc, to reconsider its three-judge panel’s decision, or it could appeal on to the U.S. Supreme Court and ask it to listen to the case. Statistically, it’s unlikely that either appeal can be successful – the D.C. Circuit grants only a few requests for rehearing en banc and the U.S. Supreme Court only hears about 1% of the cases before it.
Still, the Supreme Court should want to hear the TikTok case due to its constitutional significance and its potential impact on thousands and thousands of individuals: More than half of Americans now use the app. At least one Supreme Court justice has already began enthusiastic about TikTok: In a concurring opinion last June, Justice Amy Coney Barrett suggested that platforms could have less First Amendment protection in the event that they are run by foreign decision-makers — a suggestion which is cited within the D.C. Circuit opinion.
If it takes effect on January 19, PAFACAA can be the primary time the U.S. government has banned a social media app — and is probably not the last. Civil rights advocates have raised concerns alarm that PAFACAA could change into a blueprint for bans on other platforms within the US and abroad, in addition to by academics of the social media business predict that it will disrupt the international app economy. From the DC Circuit decision, the ACLU wrote: “This ruling sets a flawed and dangerous precedent that gives the government far too much power to silence Americans’ speech online.”
As legal options proceed to narrow, TikTok’s strategy may now focus more on politics – but the corporate’s dream of a reprieve for Trump could also be far-fetched. Some of TikTok’s most vocal critics are members of Trump’s recent Cabinet: Marco Rubio, Trump’s nominee for secretary of state, was among the many first lawmakers to call for an investigation into the app in 2018. Trump’s recent national security adviser Mike Waltz, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and FCC Chairman Brendan Carr were all outspoken supporters of a ban.
Ironically, Trump’s hands may ultimately be tied because Republicans in Congress successfully pushed to strip the law of presidential discretion, fearing that President Biden or a possible President Kamala Harris would “soften” if given an excessive amount of leeway can be granted. This could now prevent Trump from “saving” the favored app.
In a joint press release, House China Committee Chairman John Moolenaar and Raja Krishnamoorthi welcomed the ruling. “With today’s statement, all three branches of government have come to the same conclusion: ByteDance is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, and ByteDance’s ownership of TikTok poses a national security threat that cannot be mitigated by means other than divestiture,” Krishnamoorthi said.
Moolenaar reiterated that he was optimistic concerning the divestiture: “I am optimistic that President Trump will facilitate an American takeover of TikTok to enable its continued use in the United States, and I look forward to bringing the app under one ownership in America to welcome the new owner.”
MORE FROM FORBES
